现在是时候到电影院找个位子加入“X战警”的冒险旅途了。但在一个有越来越多超级英雄故事的世界里，这部电影你愿意花时间看吗?

　　“X战警：天启”在5月27日登陆各大院线，这是部被寄予厚望的电影。不仅是布莱恩辛格再次成为“X战警”的导演，他因为他所执导的“X战警：逆转未来”受到评论者和观众的好评，而且在这一年中，我们已经看到到处都是不同类型的漫画电影，比如“美国队长3：内战”和“蝙蝠侠大战超人：正义黎明”。所以说，辛格的“X战警：天启”值得你在阵亡将士纪念日前的周末花钱去电影院观看吗?评论可能会带来一些迹象，也有可能不会。“天启”现在在烂番茄(Rotten Tomatoes)上的分数是48%，这听起来并不怎么理想。

　　Crave Online的William Bibbiani可能是众多评论中总结最好的，他指出，“最新的X战警电影是在让我们对自己观看的系列有更多期待的时代中的一部巨大的、愚蠢的续集。” Alonso Duralde在The Wrap评论员将电影称作“惊人的失望”，某种程度上是因为“有趣的反派的缺失”和“系列之间的时间穿越使得变种人互相之间(以及观众们)必须重新认识对方”。

　　Av Club 的Igantiy Vishnevetsky则认为，电影中的冲突变得“更加阴暗”，“系列电影的膨胀，变种人变得难以控制，站队现在与合作(最近的电影中暗中互相变的不相信彼此)和反抗的关系减弱，更多的是与任意一个有闪回可能的白人角色傲慢的、救世主般所做的事有关。”他这样写道。

　　同时，TimeOut的Tom Huddleston，这位名字和Tom Hiddleston很相似，则认为这部电影没有令人印象深刻。“电影中没有难忘的动作场景，”他指出，“剧本没有任何意义，全是讽刺的旁白，奇怪的难以理解的天书(新时代的黎明即将来临!以撒说)以及里面的深意只有忠诚的人才会理解。”

　　并不是说这部电影没有好的评价，但称赞并不是评论中的全部。

　　“如果没有别的，这部大部分时间是愚笨的以及偶尔令人愉快的电影并不畏惧去重新对人类历史进行塑造，”IndieWIRE的David Ehrluch 这样说。Digital Spy的 Hugh Armitage 补充说，““X战警：天启”并不能达到美队3那样的成熟和复杂，但是它有属于自己的强大魅力，并且保持了电影2029星球女子监狱(Last Stand)设下的质量标准。”

　　当然，也有一些人单纯的享受观看这部电影，比如IGN的Daniel Krupa，他认为，“作为系列中的下一个篇章，天启是一部有不可否认的乐趣和令人愉悦的冒险的电影，并且在建立Xavier下一个班级上做的很不错。”

　　It's time to strap into a theater seat for a new "X-Men" adventure. But in a world increasingly filled with superhero stories, is this one you're going to want to take time for?

　　"X-Men: Apocalypse" lands in theaters on May 27 and it's a movie with some seriously big shoes to fill. Not only was Bryan Singer's return to the "X-Men" directorial chair met with high marks from reviewers and audiences with 2014's "Days of Future Past," but this is a year that's already seen highs ("Captain America: Civil War") and lows ("Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice") within the comic book film genre.

　　So is Singer's "X-Men: Apocalypse" worthy of your money at theaters over Memorial Day weekend? If the reviews are any indication, perhaps not. Currently "Apocalypse" sits at a 48% on Rotten Tomatoes, which doesn't sound great.

　　Crave Online's William Bibbiani perhaps sums of many of the reviews best, writing, "The latest 'X-Men' movie is a big, dumb sequel in an era that has led us to expect a lot more from our franchises." Alonso Duralde reviews the film for The Wrap, calling it a "shocking letdown," in part due to "the lack of an interesting villain" and "the fact that the series’ time-travel element is forcing these mutants to meet each other (and the audience) all over again for the first time."

　　For the AV Club's Ignatiy Vishnevetsky, the conflict of the films has gotten "murkier." "For the franchise’s ballooning, unmanageable cast of mutants, picking sides now seems to have less to do with choosing between cooperation (which the recent movies implicitly distrust) and resistance, and more with whichever flashback-prone white dude’s overbearing savior complex works for you," he writes.

　　Meanwhile, TimeOut's Tom Huddleston -- which is so close to Tom Hiddleston that it hurts -- was simply left unimpressed. "There are no memorable action scenes," he writes. "And the script is just nonsense, comprised entirely of sarcastic asides, portentous gobbledygook ("The dawn of a new age will rise!" cries Isaac) and insider references that only the faithful will appreciate."

　　That's not to say there have been no good reviews for the movie. However, those aren't necessarily all that complimentary.

　　"If nothing else, this spectacularly goofy and sporadically entertaining movie isn't afraid to reimagine human history," says IndieWIRE's David Ehrluch. Digital Spy's Hugh Armitage adds, "'X-Men: Apocalypse' can't reach the levels of maturity and sophistication of Civil War, but it has a messy charm all of its own, and maintains the quality set by the post-Last Stand films."

　　And of course, there are some who simply enjoyed the movie, like IGN's Daniel Krupa. He writes, "Taken as the next chapter in the series, Apocalypse is an undeniably fun and entertaining adventure and does a pretty good job of establishing Xavier's next class."

（编辑：何莹莹）